The editorial board makes an initial appraisal of each manuscript. Suitable manuscript is sent for review. Once the review process is completed the editors recommend acceptance, rejection or revision of the manuscript to author(s). The decision made by editorial board is final. In case of revised manuscript, authors are requested to send the corrected manuscript within two weeks after receiving the notification from editors. Review process is double blind peer review. Review request is sent to peers that are qualified to issue an assessment in terms of their subject expertise to different College and University Professors, Scientist and Researchers.
Review criteria are:
General issue of the topic within our journal scope
Structure of the manuscript
Problem description and objective of the manuscript addressed
Originality of paper
1. Initial Review
Each paper is subjected to suitability screening by the Editors and the Research Development Cell for possible inclusion in the Journal
2. Manuscript Number
Manuscript is numbered if it passes the initial check
3. Reviewers assigned
Editorial board assign double blinded reviewers for each manuscript
4. Plagiarism check
Manuscript is subjected to Plagiarism check, also sent to reviewers without disclosing author affiliations
5. Reviewers' report
Reviewers make feedback and recommendation about the manuscript - including acceptance, revisions, or rejection
6. Correction
Manuscript is corrected by authors as per comments of reviewers and plagiarism report
7. Final check
Editorial board asses the manuscript before publication including plagiarism check
8. Galley proof
Editorial board provide galley proof to the authors
9. Publication
The papers are published and the authors are informed
10. Promotion
Promotion to repositories and indexes
Font & design:
Bibliography data & Literature citation:
Print & online availability:
Language:
Infographic & exhibits:
Frequency: Annually
2 Months (from acceptance to publication)